Motion for Hearing to Come

In the defamation suit against Casey Anthony, lawyers for Zenaida Gonzalez requested Judge Jose R. Rodriguez to force Lee Anthony to answer two questions he refused to answer at the deposition.

The questions not answered are who is Caylee's father and did Lee at one time believe sister Casey was involved in her daughters disappearance.

Anthony's lawyer, Thomas Luka says "the questions only serve to embarrass and annoy the Anthony family," he went on to say there is no legal reason to identifying Caylee's father.

Gonzalez is asking for more than $15,000 in damages for loss of employement and public scrutiny when Casey Anthony stated a "nanny" kidnapped her daughter. She stated her name was Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy Grace Monday Update:

6:30 PM ET - While defense lawyers fight to keep jailhouse video of Casey Anthony private, they also reportedly want a videotaped statement from a corrections officer at the jail kept secret. WKMG reports the correction officer mentioned in defense attorney Jose Baez' motion to keep those jail videos private, is the same officer with tot mom the day she watches TV coverage of the discovery of Caylee's remains.



Baez also alleges the officer is discussing Casey Anthony's medical history and tot mom's reaction to what was happening in the woods near Anthony's home. Reports reveal Casey Anthony doubles over, hyperventilates and asks for anti-anxiety medication the day Caylee's remains were found. If the tapes are not released to the public, will they still be admissible at trial? (From Stacey Newman, Nancy Grace Producer)

Signals That Lee Will Be Criminally Charged

Tonight Nancy Grace discusses Lee's own attorney saying 'he's receiving signals that Lee will be criminally charged".

With evidence tamperment and/or obstruction of justice.

"Just trying to help", or was there something more to all of that investigating he was doing?

For tonights Nancy Grace Open Thread scroll down or click here.

My opinion: One possible link to the charges could be the possibility that Lee was the one on the phone with Dominic Casey on the video. Why? Because of his attorney Thomas Luka's shady answer when asked if it was Lee on the phone: "No, not that I know of. He denied ever talking to him." Very non-assuring, there, Mr. Attorney. =]

Lawyer Says Lee Denied He Was On Phone With P.I.

This denial is not looking good. It's raising major red flags with me..

"No, not that I know of. He denied ever talking to him," .. That's not very confident. He doesn't have to use the word "abolutely", but he could've said it with more determination/certainty. "not that I know of" leaves up the possiblity that he did and his client is simply lying to him.

SECOND time being asked:
"As far as I know, as far as my client is concerned, it's not him on the phone on November 15th 2008," Luka said.

Again leaving that room of doubt for Lee (well as far as he's concerned!).. And why does he keep referring to himself, in these statements why doesn't he just clearly represent his client?? That's who the question is referring to, not him! It's so frustrating to me!

"In the realm of speculation, it could've been anyone,"
How come no one STILL doesn't know? Is it that impossible to discover phone call records??

Luka said he saw it last week and talked to Dominic Casey about it. Then he backtracked.

"How did you see it last week? Who showed it to you last week?" Belich asked Luka.

"Well, I take that back," Luka said. "I was not shown it. When it was on TV I saw it."

"Well, it wasn't on TV until last night," Belich told Luka.

"Well, I take that back. I did not see it. Did I see it? No, I did not see that video. I take that back. That was not the video I saw," he said.

"Hum an ah, hum an ah, hum an ah," He's a worse liar than the Anthonys themselves!